|
Vincent Reinhart
|
Reinhart enumerates three reasons why QE3 is likely, whatever some Fed governors want to think.
- If the Fed is going to act at all, it would have to do so before June to avoid meddling in the political calendar.
- There remains economic slack, and despite how others may feel, inflation is still below the Fed's target rate of 2%
- Core FOMC members are still not seeing robust economic growth, and Reinhart agrees this is unlikely to change soon. "Anxiety-inducing headlines that the economy is losing steam would be conducive to Fed action," he writes.
But that's not the move he'd pull if he were in charge.
Reinhart argues that a better play would be to "expand the scale and scope of the existing program." In other words, Operation Twist 2.
Operation Twist 1 involved using proceeds from short-term securities sales to buy longer-term assets.
Reinhart's sequel involves extending the current purchasing program through the end of the year, which would cost about $400 billion. It would also involve selling shorter-term Treasuries and initiating what Reinhart calls "temporary reserve-draining operations."
While Reinhart puts the chances of the Fed not acting at one in four, he argues the Fed will seek to preempt any chance that the current mini-rally ends.
And he cites Ben Bernanke's unique relationship with energy prices as an indicator of where his mind's at:
"Chairman Bernanke's academic work on the strong
post-WWII association between energy price spikes and subsequent recessions puts
part of the blame on the Fed's historical response. As long as inflation
expectations are well anchored, the strong conclusion is that the central bank
should ease policy to counter the blow to aggregate demand. Thus, the
recent rise in oil prices and the risk that they go higher likely inclines the
Fed to do more, not less."

没有评论:
发表评论