显示标签为“QE”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“QE”的博文。显示所有博文

2014年10月30日星期四

The Fed Is Taking Away The Punch Bowl — Here’s What Usually Happens To Stocks When They Do That


janet yellen
AP Images
That’s enough for now, boys.
Fed Chair Janet Yellen made it official yesterday:
After nearly a year of “tapering,”the Fed is done buying bonds. The next step, barring a deterioration in the economy, will be to raise interest rates.
Slowly but surely, in other words, the Fed is taking away the punch bowl.
That’s generally not good news for stock prices.
For the past five years, the Fed has been frantically pumping money into the financial system, keeping interest rates low to encourage hedge funds and other investors to borrow and speculate. This free money, and the resulting speculation, has helped drive stocks to their current very expensive levels.
But now the Fed’s policy is moving the other way.
To be sure, for now, the Fed is still pumping oceans of money into Wall Street. And if you limit your definition of “tightening” to “raising interest rates,” the Fed is not yet tightening. But, in the past, it has arguably been the change in direction of Fed money-pumping that has been important to the stock market, not the absolute level. 
In the past, major changes in direction of Fed money-pumping have often been followed by changes in direction of stock prices.
Not immediately.
And not always.
But often.

Let’s go to the history …

Here’s a look at the past 50 years. The blue line is the Fed Funds rate (a proxy for the level of Fed money-pumping.) The red line is the S&P 500. We’ll zoom in on specific periods in a moment. Here, just note that Fed policy goes through “tightening” and “easing” phases, just as stocks go through bull and bear markets. And sometimes these phases are correlated.
Now, lets zoom in. In many of these time periods, you’ll see that sustained Fed tightening has often been followed by a decline in stock prices. Again, not immediately, and not always, but often. You’ll also see that most major declines in stock prices over this period have been preceded by Fed tightening. 
Here’s the first period, 1964 to 1980. There were three big tightening phases during this period (blue line) … and three big stock drops (red line). Good correlation!
Now 1975 to 1982. The Fed started tightening in 1976, at which point the market declined and then flattened for four years. Steeper tightening cycles in 1979 and 1980 were also followed by price drops.
From 1978 to 1990, we see the two drawdowns described above, as well as another tightening cycle followed by flattening stock prices in the late 1980s. Again, tightening precedes market drops.
1978 1990 b
Business Insider, St. Louis Fed
And, lastly, 1990 to 2014. For those who want to believe that Fed tightening is irrelevant, there’s good news here: A sharp tightening cycle in the mid-1990s did not lead to a crash! Alas, two other tightening cycles, one in 1999 to 2000 and the other from 2004 to 2007 were followed by major stock market crashes.
One of the oldest sayings on Wall Street is “Don’t fight the Fed.” This saying has meaning in both directions, when the Fed is easing and when it is tightening. A glance at these charts shows why.
On the positive side, the Fed’s tightening phases have often lasted a year or two before stock prices peaked and began to drop. So even if you’re convinced that sustained Fed tightening is now likely to lead to a sharp stock-price pullback at some point, the bull market might still have a ways to run.

2014年10月21日星期二

A Rumor About QE Is Igniting European Markets


Mario Draghi
REUTERS/Kai Pfaffenbach
Mario Draghi, President of the European Central Bank (ECB).
European markets are reacting to rumors that the European Central Bank is planning a bigger program of asset purchases to boost the bloc’s lackluster economy. 
Here’s the scorecard right now:
France’s CAC 40 is up 1.34%
Spain’s IBEX is down 1.39%
Italy’s FTSE MIB is up 2.161%
Germany’s DAX is up 1.01%
Reuters reported that the ECB is considering a much wider purchase of corporate bonds as soon as December. Currently the bank is buying some asset-backed securities and corporate, but there is a much smaller market for those purchases, as shown by Frederik Ducrozet at Credit Agricole.
The euro fell more by nearly a cent against the dollar, before rebounding as the rumor was dismissed by other news organizations:
Eur USD
Bloomberg
The report lifted equities too, all of the eurozone’s major indices are up by more than 1% so far today, but are now dipping a little. 
The ECB is denying that there is anything like this on the agenda, and the Financial Times is reporting from sources that corporate bond purchases are not on December’s agenda — at least not yet.
Here’s Italy’s FTSE MIB climbing and dropping again:
FTSE MIB
Bloomberg

2014年7月9日星期三

STOCKS CLIMB AFTER FED SIGNALS END OF QE: Here’s What You Need To Know


Bull Impaling Man Pamplona
REUTERS/Eloy Alonso
Stocks finished higher after two straight losing sessions, as the minutes from the latest FOMC meeting indicated the Fed sees a potential end to its QE program coming in October. 
First, the scoreboard:
  • Dow: 16,974.89, +68.3, (+0.4%)
  • S&P 500: 1,971.71, +8, (+0.4%)
  • Nasdaq: 4,415.83, +24.4, (+0.6%)
And now, the top stories of the day:
1) The minutes from the latest Federal Reserve’s latest Federal Open Market Committee meeting were released at 2:00 pm EST, and for the first time indicated a potential end to the Fed’s monthly asset purchase program, or Quantitative Easing (QE). The Fed has been reducing QE by $10 billion at each meeting since December 2013, and the latest minutes indicated that if the economy continues as the FOMC’s members expect, QE could end with a single $15 billion reduction at its October meeting. The minutes also showed that the Fed plans to clearly indicate to the market when it plans to begin raising rates.
2) The FOMC minutes indicated that the Fed is concerned about investors growing too complacent given the current market environment. Following the minutes release, Joe Brusuelas and Josh Wright, economists at Bloomberg LP, said, “Of special note, some on the committee observed that results from the primary dealer survey suggested that low realized volatility, generally favorable economic news and less uncertainty for the path of monetary policy might have generated complacency on the part of market participants about potential risks. Given that one purpose of the Fed’s quantitative easing policy is to encourage risk taking in order to suppress yields at the longer end of the curve, investors will probably now look closely at the Fed’s intentions regarding macroprudential measures going forward.” 
3) In its earnings release yesterday afternoon, Kip Tindell, CEO ofThe Container Store, gave an ominous warnings about the state of retail activity. “Consistent with so many of our fellow retailer, we are experiencing a retail ‘funk,’” Tindell said. Shares of The Container Store fell 9%. as the company also reported same store sales that fell 0.8% and reported a loss of $0.07 per share.
4) Shares of Gigamon cratered, losing more than 30% after the company warned investors that its revenue would be way below forecasts. BI’s Julie Bort noted that this is the second straight quarter the enterprise tech company has reduced its revenue outlook, and since topping out at $41.81, the stock is down more than 70%.  
5) Next Monday, July 14, will begin a three-week period in which 72% of the S&P 500 reports quarterly earnings. In a research note earlier today, Goldman Sachs’ Amanda Sneider highlighted 22 companies that the firm expects to beat expectations. Among the notable companies Goldman is currently forecasting to beat earnings expectations are healthcare giant McKesson and energy company CONSOL Energy. 

2012年3月8日星期四

QE Set To Leave British Pensions $141 Billion In The Hole



A second round of quantitative easing in the UK will leave the country's pension funds £90 billion ($141 billion) out of pocket, the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF) announced on the third anniversary of QE in the UK.


“Businesses running final salary pensions are being clouted by QE. Deficits that were already big now look even bigger because of its artificial distortions. 
“Pension funds want a stronger economy, so they are on board with the QE project for now. But the latest bout of £125bn of money printing has blown a £90bn hole in their side. We need help in managing that. Pension funds cannot be left holding the baby. 
“Firms are legally obliged to fill the deficits, and that diverts money away from jobs and investment, and will lead to further closures of final salary pensions in the private sector. 

Retirees trying to get a good annuity are feeling the pain too – they are getting a fifth less than they would before QE started. 

“We need to see stronger action from the authorities on this massive issue, which will hurt pension schemes for some time yet. And there is always the possibility of QE3.”

QE hurts pension funds especially by making government bonds more expensive, forcing buyers onto more risky investments — which, due to their nature, pension funds tend to avoid.


NAPF says that an average person with a pension pot of £26,000 pounds can now expect 22 percent less income than four years ago at a loss of 440 pounds a year.
Reuters reports that Bank policy maker David Miles has argued that those about to retire should find their costs offset by a rise in their investment funds.
NAPF estimates the first round of QE cost pension funds £180 billion ($283 billion), the BBC reports.




2012年2月29日星期三

Gold Instantly Spikes Lower Thanks To Bernanke



Bernanke's speech is out, and there's not much new in it, but it seems like perhaps people were looking for more hints of QE. And Bernanke offered no such hints.
So the dollar is on fire against the Euro and other currencies.
And gold is instantly diving.
chart



2012年2月2日星期四

CHART OF THE DAY: The Age Of Permanent QE



button more charts
button chart prev button chart next
In a new note, Spyros Andreopoulos at Morgan Stanley takes a big picture look at central bank balance sheets, and what he calls the "coming of age" of QE.

Whereas at first, central banks use their balance sheets surgically -- e.g. unthawing specific markets -- it's not the dominant strategy for the Fed, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of England, and the ECB to expand their balance sheets broadly at any sign of trouble or deflation.
It's now to the point where there collective balance sheets are nearing 36% of GDP.

Andreopoulos writes:
Normative considerations aside, what will actually happen? Central bank balance sheets are likely to remain bloated for a long period of time – indeed, the balance sheet expansions might even end up being quasi-permanent.

First, even if all goes smoothly and the recovery proceeds slowly but surely, it will probably take central banks many years to exit, even if you discount the fiscal dominance argument. Asset sales would have to proceed with the utmost caution – indeed, risk-aversion implies that central banks would rather err on the side of caution and sell too little, too late – just one of the reasons why we are worried about inflation in the long term. Second, if (i) the recovery remains bumpy, with more growth scares; and/or (ii) we revert to recession at some point over the next few years, it seems almost certain that balance sheets will be deployed again. So, in the near-to-medium term, the only way for balance sheets seems to be up. Finally, because of the possibility of economic shocks, the unwind of balance sheets might even take the shape of ‘two steps forward, one step back’. That is, unless we are wrong in the above and balance sheets can indeed be reduced rapidly, a balance sheet reduction that’s on the way could be interrupted by a large deflationary shock, which necessitates renewed expansion, and so on.

chart