We've been scratching our heads a little bit lately, trying to figure out what people anticipate from the Fed on the QE3 front.
We
noted our surprise yesterday, when a new survey of from WSJ showed that the
majority of economists did not expect to see QE3 happen this year. This
was surprising, since so many sell-side research shops do think QE3 is on the
way.
For example, here's SocGen making
the case for QE3 at the April meeting.
Also complicating factors is that the economy seems to doing fine, and
financial markets are clearly robust, so what's the impetus?
Calculated
Risk has posted this excerpt from a new speech from SF
Fed President John Williams that spells it out nicely:
What does this tell us about where monetary policy
should be now? Inflation in 2012 and 2013 is likely to come in around 1½
percent, below the FOMC’s 2 percent target. And clearly, with unemployment at
8.3 percent, we are very far from maximum employment. At the San Francisco Fed,
our forecast is that the unemployment rate will remain well over 7 percent for
several more years.
This is a situation in which there’s no conflict
between maximum employment and price stability. With regard to both of the Fed’s
mandates, it’s vital that we keep the monetary policy throttle wide open. This
will help lower unemployment and raise inflation back toward levels consistent
with our mandates. And we want to do so quickly to minimize total economic
damage. The longer we miss our objectives, the larger the cumulative loss to the
economy.
That's really the bottom line. Below-target inflation and below-target
unemployment. Why not do more?http://www.zaobao.com/special/malay/pages/mypol111012.shtml

没有评论:
发表评论